Ease of Use: (1 – Very Difficult To Use, 2 – Difficult To Use, 3 – Indifferent, 4 – Easy To Use, 5 – Very Easy To Use)
Functionality: (1 – Very Poor, 2 – Poor, 3 – Indifferent, 4 – Good, 5 – Very Good)
Safety: (1 – Not Safe At All, 2 – Not Safe, 3 – Indifferent, 4 – Safe, 5 – Very Safe)
Delivered Impact: (1 – Not Satisfied At All, 2 – Not Satisfied, 3 – Indifferent, 4 – Satisfied, 5 – Very Satisfied)
User Experience: (1 – Very Poor, 2 – Poor, 3 – Indifferent, 4 – Good, 5 – Very Good)
User Interface: (1 – Not Satisfied At All, 2 – Not Satisfied, 3 – Indifferent, 4 – Satisfied, 5 – Very Satisfied)
User Interface:
| Typography | Items | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| The number of fonts | ||||||
| Consistent colour use of each type and the number of font colours | ||||||
| Appropriate use of type elements, regarding function | ||||||
| Visual Hierarchy | Consideration of Visual Hierarchy | |||||
| Grid-based Layout Alignment | Appropriate use of grid | |||||
| Appropriate alignment | ||||||
| Establishes a hierarchy of information | ||||||
| Colours | Soothing effect | |||||
| Appropriate colour palette and colour relationship | ||||||
| Legibility | Contrast between type and background | |||||
| Solid-colour background | ||||||
| Appropriate type sizes | ||||||
| Buttons | Contrast between text and background colours | |||||
| Looks tappable | ||||||
| Intuitiveness, Simplicity | Familiarity to use | |||||
| Concise texts and paragraphs | ||||||
| The appropriate amount of white space | ||||||
| Navigation | The appropriate number of categories and levels | |||||
| Arrangement based on priority | ||||||
| Clear, concise and consistent labels for navigation | ||||||
| Contents | Appropriate organisation | |||||
| Understandable and complete content | ||||||
| Attractiveness | Stylistic expectation | |||||
| Variation in the visual factors | ||||||
| Consistency | Consistency of content | |||||
| Final score out of 125 ÷ 25 = 5 | ||||||